Tuesday, February 7, 2023
HomeNatureShock cooling of a red-supergiant supernova at redshift 3 in lensed photos

Shock cooling of a red-supergiant supernova at redshift 3 in lensed photos

[ad_1]

  • Waxman, E. & Katz, B. in Handbook of Supernovae (eds Alsabti, A. & Murdin, P.) 967–1015 (Springer, 2017).

  • Garnavich, P. M. et al. Shock breakout and early mild curves of sort II-P supernovae noticed with Kepler. Astrophys. J. 820, 23 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arcavi, I. et al. SN 2011dh: discovery of a kind IIb supernova from a compact progenitor within the close by galaxy M51. Astrophys. J. Lett. 742, L18 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morales-Garoffolo, A. et al. SN 2011fu: a kind IIb supernova with a luminous double-peaked mild curve. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 454, 95–114 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ben-Ami, S. et al. Discovery and early multi-wavelength measurements of the energetic sort Ic supernova PTF12gzk: a massive-star explosion in a dwarf host galaxy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 760, L33 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Valenti, S. et al. The primary month of evolution of the slow-rising sort IIP SN 2013ej in M74. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 438, L101–L105 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bersten, M. C. et al. A surge of sunshine on the delivery of a supernova. Nature 554, 497–499 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tartaglia, L. et al. The progenitor and early evolution of the kind IIb SN 2016gkg. Astrophys. J. Lett. 836, L12 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arcavi, I. et al. Constraints on the progenitor of SN 2016gkg from its shock-cooling mild curve. Astrophys. J. Lett. 837, L2 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Piro, A. L., Haynie, A. & Yao, Y. Shock cooling emission from prolonged materials revisited. Astrophys. J. 909, 209 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szalai, T. et al. The kind II-P supernova 2017eaw: from explosion to the nebular section. Astrophys. J. 876, 19 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rui, L. et al. Probing the final-stage progenitor evolution for sort IIP supernova 2017eaw in NGC 6946. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 485, 1990–2000 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiang, D. et al. Observations of SN 2017ein reveal shock breakout emission and a large progenitor star for a kind Ic supernova. Astrophys. J. 871, 176 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soumagnac, M. T. et al. SN 2018fif: the explosion of a giant purple supergiant found in its infancy by the Zwicky Transient Facility. Astrophys. J. Letters 902, 6 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lotz, J. M. et al. The Frontier Fields: survey design and preliminary outcomes. Astrophys. J. 837, 97 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Struble, M. F. & Rood, H. J. A compilation of redshifts and velocity dispersions for Abell clusters (Epoch 1991.2). Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 77, 363–377 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Benítez, N. Bayesian photometric redshift estimation. Astrophys. J. 536, 571–583 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G. & Coppi, P. EAZY: a quick, public photometric redshift code. Astrophys. J. 686, 1503–1513 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kawamata, R. et al. Measurement–luminosity relations and UV luminosity capabilities at z = 6–9 concurrently derived from the whole Hubble Frontier Fields information. Astrophys. J. 855, 4 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kawamata, R., Oguri, M., Ishigaki, M., Shimasaku, Okay. & Ouchi, M. Exact robust lensing mass modeling of 4 Hubble Frontier Subject clusters and a pattern of magnified high-redshift galaxies. Astrophys. J. 819, 114 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oguri, M. The mass distribution of SDSS J1004.4112 revisited. Publ Astron. Soc. Jpn 62, 1017–1024 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oguri, M. Quick calculation of gravitational lensing properties of elliptical Navarro–Frenk–White and Hernquist density profiles. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 133, 074504 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nakar, E. & Sari, R. Early supernovae mild curves following the shock breakout. Astrophys. J. 725, 904–921 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rabinak, I. & Waxman, E. The early UV/optical emission from core-collapse supernovae. Astrophys. J. 728, 63 (2011); erratum 770, 81 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nakar, E. & Piro, A. L. Supernovae with two peaks within the optical mild curve and the signature of progenitors with low-mass prolonged envelopes. Astrophys. J. 788, 193 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Piro, A. L. Utilizing double-peaked supernova mild curves to check prolonged materials. Astrophys. J. Lett. 808, L51 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sapir, N. & Waxman, E. UV/optical emission from the increasing envelopes of sort II supernovae. Astrophys. J. 838, 130 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morozova, V., Piro, A. L. & Valenti, S. Unifying sort II supernova mild curves with dense circumstellar materials. Astrophys. J. 838, 28 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morozova, V., Piro, A. L. & Valenti, S. Measuring the progenitor plenty and dense circumstellar materials of sort II supernovae. Astrophys. J. 858, 15 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Margalit, B. Analytic mild curves of dense CSM shock breakout and cooling. Astrophys. J. 933, 238 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kass, R. E. & Raftery, A. E. Bayes components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 773–795 (1995).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, W. et al. Close by supernova charges from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search – II. The noticed luminosity capabilities and fractions of supernovae in an entire pattern. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 412, 1441–1472 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelly, P. L. et al. A number of photos of a extremely magnified supernova fashioned by an early-type cluster galaxy lens. Science 347, 1123–1126 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goobar, A. et al. iPTF16geu: a multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed sort Ia supernova. Science 356, 291–295 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodney, S. A. et al. A gravitationally lensed supernova with an observable two-decade time delay. Nat. Astron. 5, 1118–1125 (2021).

  • Oguri, M. Robust gravitational lensing of explosive transients. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 126901 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Foxley-Marrable, M. et al. Observing the earliest moments of supernovae utilizing robust gravitational lenses. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 495, 4622–4637 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grogin, N. A. et al. CANDELS: The Cosmic Meeting Close to-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 197, 35 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Postman, M. et al. The cluster lensing and supernova survey with Hubble: an summary. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 199, 25 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Strolger, L. G. et al. The speed of core collapse supernovae to redshift 2.5 from the CANDELS and CLASH supernova surveys. Astrophys. J. 813, 93 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidt, B. P. et al. The space of 5 sort II supernovae utilizing the increasing photosphere methodology and the worth of H0. Astrophys. J. 432, 42–48 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hamuy, M. & Pinto, P. A. Sort II supernovae as standardized candles. Astrophys. J. 566, L63–L66 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelly, P. L. & Kirshner, R. P. Core-collapse supernovae and host galaxy stellar populations. Astrophys. J. 759, 107 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Drout, M. R. et al. The primary systematic research of sort Ibc supernova multi-band mild curves. Astron. J. 741, 97 (2011); erratum 753, 180 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prentice, S. J. et al. The bolometric mild curves and bodily parameters of stripped-envelope supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 458, 2973–3002 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. Cosmic star-formation historical past. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 415–486 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salpeter, E. D. The luminosity perform and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fruchter, A. S., Hack, W., Dencheva, M., Droettboom, M., & Greenfield, P. BetaDrizzle: a redesign of the MultiDrizzle package deal. In 2010 House Telescope Science Institute Calibration Workshop (eds Deustua, S. & Oliveira, C.) 382–387 (House Telescope Science Institute, 2010).

  • Jones, D. O., Scolnic, D. M., & Rodney, S. A. PythonPhot: easy DAOPHOT-type photometry in Python. Astrophysics Supply Code Library https://www.ascl.internet/1501.010 (2015).

  • Stetson, P. B. DAOPHOT: a pc program for crowded-field stellar photometry. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 99, 191–222 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D. & Rix, H.-W. Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy photos. Astron. J. 124, 266–293 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dong, S. et al. ASASSN-15lh: a extremely super-luminous supernova. Science 351, 257–260 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bradač, M. et al. Hubble Frontier Subject photometric catalogues of Abell 370 and RXC J2248.7-4431: multiwavelength photometry, photometric redshifts, and stellar properties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 99–107 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Maraston, C. & Strömbäck, G. Stellar inhabitants fashions at excessive spectral decision. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 418, 2785–2811 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schulze, S. et al. The Palomar Transient Manufacturing facility core-collapse supernova host-galaxy pattern. I. Host-galaxy distribution capabilities and surroundings dependence of core-collapse supernovae. Astron. J. Suppl. Ser. 255, 29 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidt, G. D., Weymann, R. J. & Foltz, C. B. A moderate-resolution, high-throughput CCD channel for the MMT spectrograph. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 101, 713–724 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rothberg, B. et al. Present standing of the power instrumentation suite on the Giant Binocular Telescope Observatory. In Proc. SPIE 10702: Floor-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII (eds Evans, C. J. et al.) 1070205 (SPIE, 2018).

  • McLean, I. S. et al. MOSFIRE, the multi-object spectrometer for infrared exploration on the Keck Observatory. In Proc. SPIE 8446, Floor-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV (eds McLean, I. S. et al.) 84460J (SPIE, 2012).

  • Prochaska, J. X. et al. PypeIt: the Python spectroscopic information discount pipeline. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06505 (2020).

  • Prochaska, J. X. et al. pypeit/PypeIt: launch 1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3743493 (2020).

  • Konidaris, N. & Steidel, C. MOSFIRE DRP https://keck-datareductionpipelines.github.io/MosfireDRP/#mosfire-drp (2018).

  • Wilkinson, D. M., Maraston, C., Goddard, D., Thomas, D. & Parikh, T. FIREFLY (Becoming IteRativEly For Probability analYsis): a full spectral becoming code. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 472, 4297–4326 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reddy, N. A. et al. The MOSDEF Survey: vital evolution within the rest-frame optical emission line equal widths of star-forming galaxies at z = 1.4–3.8. Astrophys. J. 869, 92 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Keeton, C. R. On modeling galaxy-scale robust lens programs. Gen. Rel. Grav. 42, 2151–2176 (2010).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCully, C., Keeton, C. R., Wong, Okay. C. & Zabludoff, A. I. A brand new hybrid framework to effectively mannequin strains of sight to gravitational lenses. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 443, 3631–3642 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ammons, S. M., Wong, Okay. C., Zabludoff, A. I. & Keeton, C. R. Mapping compound cosmic telescopes containing a number of projected cluster-scale halos. Astron. J. 781, 2 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson, T. L. et al. Lens fashions and magnification maps of the six Hubble Frontier Fields clusters. Astron. J. 797, 48 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jullo, E. et al. A Bayesian strategy to robust lensing modelling of galaxy clusters. New J. Phys. 9, 447 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Faber, S. M. & Jackson, R. E. Velocity dispersions and mass-to-light ratios for elliptical galaxies. Astrophys. J. 204, 668–683 (1976).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Witt, H. J. & Mao, S. On the magnification relations in quadruple lenses: a second strategy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 311, 689–697 (2000).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Drout, M. R. et al. Quickly evolving and luminous transients from Pan-STARRS1. Astrophys. J. 794, 23 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. AT2018cow: a luminous millimeter transient. Astrophys. J. 871, 73 (2019); erratum 935, 62 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Margutti, R. et al. An embedded X-ray supply shines by the aspherical AT2018cow: revealing the inside workings of probably the most luminous fast-evolving optical transients. Astrophys. J. 872, 18 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: the MCMC hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 306–312 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, W. Further information for ‘Shock cooling of a red-supergiant supernova at redshift 3 in lensed photos’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6725770 (2022).

  • Kriek, M. et al. An ultra-deep near-infrared spectrum of a compact quiescent galaxy at z = 2.2. Astrophys. J. 700, 221–231 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schreiber, C. & Dickinson, H. FAST++ v1.3.1. GitHub https://github.com/cschreib/fastpp (2021).

  • Morishita, T. et al. Characterizing intracluster mild within the Hubble Frontier Fields. Astrophys. J. 846, 139 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diego, J. M. et al. Darkish matter underneath the microscope: constraining compact darkish matter with caustic crossing occasions. Astrophys. J. 857, 25 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Menzies, J. W. et al. Spectroscopic and photometric observations of SN 1987a: the primary 50 days. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 227, 39P–49P (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hosseinzaden, G. et al. Weak mass loss from the purple supergiant progenitor of the kind II SN 2021yja. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08155 (2022).

  • Bullivant, C. et al. SN 2013fs and SN 2013fr: exploring the circumstellar-material variety in sort II supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 476, 1497–1518 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Valenti, S. et al. The range of sort II supernova versus the similarity of their progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc 459, 3939–3962 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. SN 2020bvc: a broad-line sort Ic supernova with a double-peaked optical mild curve and a luminous X-ray and radio counterpart. Astrophys. J. 902, 86 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Y. et al. The younger and close by regular sort Ia supernova 2018gv: UV–optical observations and the earliest spectropolarimetry. Astrophys. J. 902, 46 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ho, A. Y. Q. et al. The Koala: a quick blue optical transient with luminous radio emission from a starburst dwarf galaxy at z = 0.27. Astrophys. J. 895, 49 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richardson, D., Jenkins, R. L. III, Wright, J. & Maddox, L. Absolute-magnitude distributions of supernovae. Astrophys. J. 147, 118 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Taylor, M. et al. The core collapse supernova price from the SDSS-II supernova survey. Astrophys. J. 792, 135 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hatano, Okay., Department, D. & Deaton, J. Extinction and radial distribution of supernova properties of their guardian galaxies. Astrophys. J. 502, 177–181 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Calzetti, D. et al. The mud content material and opacity of actively star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 533, 682–695 (2000).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jeffreys, H. An invariant kind for the prior likelihood in estimation issues. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 186, 453–461 (1946).

    Article 
    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelly, P. L. & Refsdal, S. N. et al. Classification as a luminous and blue SN 1987A-like sort II supernova. Astrophys. J. 831, 205 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pastorello, A. et al. SN 2009E: a faint clone of SN 1987A. Astron. Astrophys. 537, A141 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taddia, F. et al. Lengthy-rising sort II supernovae from Palomar Transient Manufacturing facility and Caltech Core-Collapse Undertaking. Astron. Astrophys. 588, A5 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coe, D., Benítez, N., Broadhurst, T. & Moustakas, L. A. A high-resolution mass map of galaxy cluster substructure: LensPerfect evaluation of A1689. Astrophys. J. 723, 1678 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    RELATED ARTICLES

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments

    Verified by MonsterInsights